On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 01:42:07PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to be a > > release architecture for etch. > > > We have also asked about removing m68k from testing since it is not > > currently a release candidate; Anthony Towns has indicated his preference > > to defer this until another solution can be implemented for m68k's needs. > > This raises the question again of what such a structure should look like; I > > think it would be a good idea for us to begin to tackle this question, > > It's just short of a month since Steve posted this, with, as far as > I've seen, no concrete suggestions on what the m68k porters want to do > about this. I expect we'll be dropping m68k from etch fairly shortly, > unless someone comes up with a plan for supporting a "Debian 4.0-m68k" > release in the next few days.
My personnal plan is to set up one or two fast amd64 octocore as a m68k buildd. That would lift most of the objection with the port. Anthony, by any chance, could you arrange for a donation ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
