On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:53:14PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:21:18AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > It seems the tags in the packaging repo do not actually match the > > uploads > > to the archive, and I do not know why: this is a team-maintained > > package, > > and the Yubico folks who did the original packaging (and are part of the > > team) seem to have lost interest in maintaining their packages, so I > > have > > no idea which process they were using. > > Sure, but when you upload the package it needs to contain the changes you > expect. So either the change should be reverted, or it should be documented > in the changelog (ideally with rationale).
Yes, definitely; I was just explaining why that slipped in (but I now know better and use debdiff). > > It looks like something was uploaded, though: > > Didn't you do that? (Or your sponsor, I guess, but I still assumed you'd be > aware.) > [...] > I didn't remove anything, no. I have nothing to do with the package, just > looking at what's been proposed / uploaded in order to decide whether to > accept it. OK, I will go, do the necessary fixes and upload to stretch-pu again :) Best, nicoo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature