Hi, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > was your initial phrase 'Please > > let the release team know how we can be of assistance to you in setting > > and meeting goals for an m68k release' just a hollow phrase... > > I never said anything of the kind. The way you reacted to my mail, I assumed you were part of the release team and were somehow offended by it, I apologize for the confusion. > If the m68k team can make the port happen without messing up the rest > of Debian, great. But from my perspective the huge delays on the > autobuilders are a disaster. Without actually fixing this, we cannot > permit an architecture that is unable to keep up with autobuilds to > slow everything else down. > > For example, the inattention of the porting team to the guile-1.6 bug > means that gnucash is at 2.0.2 on every architecture except m68k, > where it is version *1.8.10*. This could mean as well, that gnucash won't be part of the m68k release, although now that guile is fixed this could look as well quite different. It's still quite a leap in conclusion here to get from problems with a few packages to declaring m68k not releaseable at all. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
