Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 16/01/2019 09:31, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Are you going to force gnustep-base to testing or you want me to do > > something else? > > I don't plan on forcing this.
OK. > I would rather this is solved one way or another, either via strict > dependencies or by versioned breaks if possible. I leave that up to > you. I don't think versioned breaks on a binNMUed package is a good idea; the version may vary accross architectures. It is also not a feasible long-term solution as more packages will fail when we add more tests in the future. I find it odd that the ci test is installing a package that's going to be decrufted once gnustep-base migrates to testing -- it is basically testing an impossible scenario. But I think I understand why it is implemented this way. I'm going to upload gnustep-base/1.26.0-3 with strict dependencies as there are other issues which makes this necessary; hopefully the gnustep-sqlclient autopkgtest in testing will be skipped then. > > * lusernet.app was built against libpantomime1.2 > > Scheduled. Thanks.
