On 13/01/2019 18:52, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Hi Emilio, > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:08 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> > wrote: >> On 04/01/2019 23:08, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: >>> It's a small transition with only three packages: biboumi, >>> libqtshadowsocks and qtcreator. All three build fine with >>> this botan release as well. >> >> Go ahead. > Uploaded and even migrated to Buster, but just realized that I don't > see the binNMUs.
Oh, I missed those. > Meanwhile botan 2.9.0 was released[1], packaged and uploaded to > experimental as it contains a soname change again and fixes a security > issue. Also contain many other fixes to prevent side channel attacks. > Of course, the dependencies still build fine with this release as > well. > Is it allowed to further update an ongoing transition? Normally that would be a different transition but since I haven't scheduled the binNMUs and due to the security fixes and to the good package state, let's go ahead with 2.9.0. Emilio
