On 2019-01-04 10:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 07/12/2018 01:21, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu >> >> nmu pocl_1.1-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with latest gcc to collect >> symbol updates." >> >> These rebuilds will fail due to changed symbols ... which is a bit >> strange since the package was already built with gcc-8. >> Such symbol changes could affect other packages as well. > > If the rebuilds will fail, how's a binNMU going to help? If you meant > something > else by 'these rebuilds will fail', then now there is #916024 so I suppose a > binNMU is no longer appropriate in any case.
The binNMUs will fail, but the build logs will contain the symbol information updates needed to fix #916024. I'll follow up with a sourceful upload, not two. Andreas
