isn't there something more productive to do with y'alls time?
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:48 AM Ian Jackson <
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"):
> > I was led to believe — althought naturally feel very free to
> > correct me — that the AH team were (quite correctly,) handling this
> > issue and thus I have not been taking action on it myself as
> > leader@.
> >
> > I therefore also eagerly their opinion and/or correction this
> > matter.
>
> Please see the AH team's response here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907199#47
>
> ISTM that the AH team have done a very helpful job, providing a clear
> opinion about both: (i) the suitability for Debian of the package in
> its current state; and (ii) the proper way to implement that,
> sociopolitically.
>
> Personally even though I think this package is unacceptable in its
> current state, our tradition in Debian would normally be to leave the
> package in old releases and remove it only from new ones.
>
> So, should the next thing be an RM bug requesting the package be
> removed from unstable ?
>
> Ian.
>
> --
> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
>
> If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
> a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
>
>
