On Sat 2018-10-06 18:13:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug >> report, >> and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with this >> message: >> >> <903...@bugs.debian.org>: host buxtehude.debian.org[209.87.16.39] >> said: 550 >> malware detected: Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.db3039.UNOFFICIAL: message >> rejected >> (in reply to end of DATA command) > > I'd be interested to know if that's still the case. Does changing the > compression format help?
It appears to have been fixed, without having to change the compression format. > Please go ahead. done, thanks. however, i note that since the original report, there have been more updates on publicsuffix upstream (the state of the DNS continues to change). I've uploaded those changes to unstable as 20181003.1334-1, but those changes should probably also be ported to stretch. i'll soon submit another bug report asking for that update as well on top of 20180523.2326-0+deb9u1, unless you want me to reuse this current bug report. regards, --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature