Hi all!
On Mit, 27 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - If a component of a package lists a non-free license, but is distributed
> as part of a larger work that includes a blanket license statement,
> resulting in ambiguity about which license the component is distributed
> under, the bug is not RC with the condition that the maintainer is
> expected to seek a clarification.
This would mean that a priori we can assume that these bugs are not RC
for TeX live, as this is a blanket license statement of following the
DFSG in inclusion of packages (plus GFDL documents which have already
been removed from the packages).
For those problems surfacing we are contacting upstream (=texlive dev
list) and up-upstream (original authors) normally.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LLANELLI (adj.)
Descriptive of the waggling movement of a person's hands when shaking
water from them or warming up for a piece of workshop theatre.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
