severity 388646 important severity 388155 important severity 388603 important severity 388604 important severity 388782 important severity 388610 important severity 388784 important severity 387979 important severity 388600 important severity 388666 important severity 388780 important severity 388676 important severity 388331 important severity 388781 important severity 388783 important severity 388156 important thanks
Hi Bill, Thanks for all your work on QAing packages for the release. After discussion on #debian-release (where you're welcome to join us, btw, whenever you have time), the conclusion is that purging packages with debconf removed from the system does not accurately model a real-world problem (865 packages in unstable depend on debconf, including 2 required packages, 7 important packages, and 9 standard packages), so in spite of being a policy violation these bugs should not be treated as release-critical. The other purge bugs you've reported all involve packages that it's much more realistic for a user to remove from their system (netbase: 5 standard reverse-deps, nothing higher; ucf: 1 standard reverse-dep), so I agree that these should be treated as RC. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]