Control: tags -1 confirmed On 28/05/18 15:59, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 - confirmed >> >> On 23/05/18 13:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 23/04/18 20:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: >>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>> Severity: normal >>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>>> Usertags: transition >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to request a transition for curl in order to unblock the >>>>> migration >>>>> to OpenSSL 1.1 (#871056). This is necessary due to the fact that the curl >>>>> ABI >>>>> exposes a structure inherited from libssl itself, which was changed in >>>>> the 1.1 >>>>> update (see #844018 for more information). >>>> >>>> I was looking at this in order to ack it. However I've noticed that >>>> libcurl4 >>>> conflicts against libcurl3. Why is that? That's going to make the >>>> transition >>>> hard, can it be removed? >>>> >>>> Hmm, I just realised libcurl3 ships libcurl.so.4, so that explains the >>>> conflict. >>>> I just found the rationale for this in >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/curl/merge_requests/2. That means this >>>> will have >>>> to wait until there are no conflicting ongoing transitions. I will ack >>>> this when >>>> that time comes. >>> >>> Please go ahead now. >>> >>> Since all packages need to migrate at the same time, some NMUs may be >>> needed to >>> fix potential FTBFS in rdeps. I will notify this bug when the binNMUs are >>> done >>> and we have a list of failing packages. >> >> I've acked the R transition, so let's wait for that now. > > Ugh, sorry for the big delay. curl 7.60.0-2 just got accepted (it was stuck in > NEW due to the fact I had to upload a new version to sid last week to fix > security issues so the experimental upload got removed, and I didn't make it > in > time to clear 7.60.0 with the migration changes through experimental). > > This is totally my fault, I should have notified you about that when I did the > upload. I hope this doesn;t cause you too much of a pain. Is there anything I > can do to fix this?
No problem, I didn't notice that it was back in NEW, otherwise I would have asked for fast processing. Thankfully we didn't end up with both this and the R transition starting at the same time, which would have caused me quite some headaches. Let's go with this. I'll schedule the binNMUs soon. Cheers, Emilio
