On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 23/04/18 21:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> As I remember, 99% of the FTBFS reasons were the icu-config removal, >> others are the dependent package bugs I've already mentioned. I do not >> recall any API change. In short, there are fifteen packages FTBFS and >> all is due to the icu-config removal. This is true for the date of my >> previous mail. There were several dependent packages upload since >> then, but I think the situation remained the same. > > In that case I'm ok with removing icu-config, but please don't entangle that > with the SONAME bump. That is, reintroduce icu-config so we can have an easy > transition, and once the transition is finished, then you are free to drop > icu-config. Sounds good? I do agree and open to do an other compilation test of the dependent packages with icu-config being available.
Cheers, Laszlo/GCS
