On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:44:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> Stable release team, please react accordingly; you may for example >>> do a binary sourceless NMU for the architectures that have >>> -8sarge3 the security update so that they all have -8sarge3 the >>> maintainer update. >> I have now heard about what the security problem addressed in >> -8sarge3 the security update is. It is believed not to be >> exploitable. I thus now officially request a binary NMU to replace >> -8sarge3 the security update by -8sarge3 the maintainer update on >> the arches that have -8sarge3 the security update. > And which archs are those? I sent that mail before reading the mail from Martin Zobel-Helas authorising a -8sarge4 without any changes to force a rebuild (because that mail was not CCed to me personally). I'm now pursuing that route, and I'm taking back my binary NMU request. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
