On 13.03.2018 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/03/18 10:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> As you can see it's a bunch of packages building with gcc-6 & g++-6. They >> probably >> need new upstream versions that support GCC 7. The only exception is >> libpam-script >> build-depending on libgfortran3 for no apparent good reason. I filed #889876 >> for that. > > I filed bugs for these: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=gcc-6-rm > >> As for the GCJ removal, I crafted this list of binary packages. This is >> running >> for sid, so it catches more stuff. > >> Some things here need to be updated to use openjdk or default-jdk, e.g. >> kamailio, pdftk, libidn... >> Other things likely need to be removed since GCJ is no more, e.g. ant-gcj, >> ecj-gcj... > > And for these: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=gcj-rm
Please could you extend the latter with bug reports where default-jdk/default-jre is going to away altogether because it's provided by gcj? Things like db5.3 come to my mind ... Matthias
