It should be all right on armxx. However what i believed to be a memory exhaustion bug might be some problem with v8 and some mips/s390x processors (which is bad news, but i'm not sure it's the case yet).
Jérémy 2018-01-09 18:55 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:43:13 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 04/01/18 16:28, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2018-01-04 12:09 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org > > > <mailto:po...@debian.org>>: > > > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > > > On 04/01/18 02:40, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org <http://release.debian.org> > > > > Severity: normal > > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > <mailto:release.debian....@packages.debian.org> > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > nodejs 8.9.3 brings the following improvements for debian: > > > > - a backported openssl 1.1.0 compatibility from nodejs 9.x branch > > > > - hard-to-debug segmentation faults fix (#878674) > > > > - it is an upstream LTS branch > > > > > > > > Julien Puydt and me checked all direct reverse build-deps and i > > > > took care of several issues that appeared with the update: > > > > - test failures caused by the move to openssl 1.1.0 > > > > - failures caused by exception names changes in assert module > > > > - failures caused by api that was deprecated long ago then > dropped > > > > > > > > There was no major issue with pure javascript modules and > > > > addons depending on nodejs-abi were rebuilt smoothly after the > fixes. > > > > > > The ongoing nodejs transition to 6.12.0 hasn't been completed yet > due to a build > > > failure on mips(el) and those segfaults. Given 8.9/experimental > seems to fix all > > > those issues, let's go with that version. > > > > > > > > > Cool. Do you mean i should upload it to unstable now ? > > For the record, Jérémy Lal uploaded nodejs a few days ago (although it > is not built on all archs yet, arm64 and armhf are missing). > > Saludos >