Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 16:01 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 09:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: block -1 by 873054 > > > > > > On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 01:25 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote: > > > > There is a bug in the unbound package shipped in stretch > > > > (1.6.0-3) > > > > that > > > > will cause DNS resolution to fail on systems that install the > > > > unbound > > > > package between September 11 and October 11, 2017. The upstream > > > > developers have released 1.6.5 with a fix for this problem: > > > > [...] > > > > Additionally, since new installs of the unbound package > > > > initialize > > > > the > > > > autotrust anchor file for the DNS root > > > > (/var/lib/unbound/root.key) > > > > from > > > > a copy shipped in the dns-root-data package > > > > (/usr/share/dns/root.key), > > > > the dns-root-data package in stretch needs to be updated to > > > > transition > > > > the root zone trust anchor KSK-2017 to the RFC 5011 "VALID" > > > > state. > > > > (The > > > > stretch-pu request for the dns-root-data package is #873054.) > > > > Accordingly, the proposed unbound 1.6.0-3+deb9u1 implements a > > > > versioned > > > > dependency on the dns-root-data package that would be shipped > > > > in > > > > #873054. > > > > > > That means that we'd also need to release dns-root-data via > > > -updates, > > > otherwise most users won't be able to install the fixed unbound. > > > It > > > also imposes an ordering on the p-u requests, so adding a > > > blocking > > > relationship to indicate that. > > > > That happened now, please feel free to upload. > > Uploaded. Thanks!
Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam