-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:30, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> In linux.debian.kernel Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be
>>>> true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for
>>>> me to ignore the opinion of the debian-legal@ armchair lawyers.
>>> Could they have signed license agreements that we (not being
>>> executives of RHAT and Novell) don't know about?
>> While it may be possible in theory, it's also very hard to believe.
Because?????
> If there are any signed license agreements, then they will probably drop some
> notes in the {src}.rpm packages themselves they distribute to give their
> users a clue, since these users are the most interested end to be aware of
> that legal situation.
Do any Debianites read SRC.RPM packages?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE1mafS9HxQb37XmcRAhFkAJ46nS1OMTb8wfh8o8BhLJcFyBmacACguNyX
E3zH8yiy+axVb6EsSoCsfx8=
=mfDp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
