On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 13:43 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 09:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:50:17 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> > >> > > $ reportbug release.debian.org > >> > > ... > >> > > What sort of request is this? (If none of these things mean anything > >> > > to you, or you are trying to report a bug in an existing package, > >> > > please > >> > > press Enter to exit reportbug.) > > [...] > >> > > wheezy is now maintained by the LTS team, and there are no longer > >> > > any wheezy-pu updates throught the release team. > >> > > >> > In principle it makes sense to me, but given this is RT-land, i'd > >> > rather them ack it explicitly (added in CC) > >> > > >> > Release team: do you want to add a `stretch-pu` at the same time, so > >> > that we'll have a reportbug in stretch with that option too? (or is it > >> > too early?) > >> > > >> Yes, might as well. > > > > It looks like that never happened? #862801 is closed, but the only > > relevant-looking commit I can find in reportbug's git repository updates > > the codename to suite mapping list, but not the release.d.o bug handling > > code. > > i tested it and it seemed to work, and now when i install reportbug > 7.1.7 and try `reportbug r.d.o` i got this menu
Hmmm. It was reported on IRC that it didn't work and I missed that the way the requests are generated has changed since jessie. It sounds like there was simply confusion all around; apologies for the noise. Regards, Adam