Your message dated Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:27:01 +0200
with message-id <01bdf869-5dd8-c67e-8f83-69cbee58f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#864968: transition: libunistring
has caused the Debian Bug report #864968,
regarding transition: libunistring
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
864968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
I'd want to upload libunistring 0.9.7 to unstable. The ABI is bumped.
I've test built the rdeps:
- libpsl
- forked-daapd
- gettext
- gss-ntlmssp
- guile-2.0
- kamailio
- libidn2-0
- lxhotkey
- termdebug
- tracker
- wcd
- freeipa
- gnunet
All builds are ok.
CU
Jörg
Ben file:
title = "libunistring";
is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libunistring0)\b/ | .depends ~
/\b(libunistring2)\b/;
is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libunistring2)\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libunistring0)\b/;
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=vAOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25/06/17 13:29, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:37:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> The package name is already changed in experimental. I'm not sure the work
>> and
>> confusion of keeping the old package name is worth it given the low number of
>> rdeps and the fact that they should rebuild just fine.
>
> Agreed, the waiting game is already over and it currently doesn't clash
> with any others.
>
> Please go ahead, as soon as possible.
This is done. Closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
