On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:16:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 17 July 2006 16:37, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Well, couldn't we just kill the 2.4-kernel-related packages from > > > > unstable/testing?
> > > Second: no, not yet, as that would break D-I beta 2 installations (as > > > was already discussed on IRC with Bastian this morning). > > If they require the kernel-latest packages, and those packages are > > uninstallable, isn't d-i beta2 currently already broken on s390? > No, Beta2 for S/390 is currently not broken as by a happy coincidence it > does not use the kernel-latest packages. Instead it installs the -2 > kernel-image packages which are available. So, removing S/390 2.4 related > kernel images from testing _will_ break Beta2. Ok; but this report was about the kernel-latest-2.4-s390 packages, which as I understand were not used for beta2 and won't be used for beta3 either. So still no reason to keep them. > Also, a few arches will still use 2.4 kernels in Beta 3. Removing 2.4 > support from D-I is a release goal for RC1 (see the minutes of the last > d-i team meeting). Thus, the first moment that _all_ 2.4 related kernel > packages can be removed from the archive will be after D-I RC1. We weren't talking about removing all of them, just the ones from the kernel-latest-2.4-s390 source package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
