2017-03-15 20:07 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org>:
> On 13/03/17 14:06, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> Hello!
>> I ran into an interesting problem with the Terminix package[1].
>>
>> Upstream was sent a trademark infringement letter from a lawyer of
>> Terminix, a pest control company, asking upstream to rename the
>> project, which they did now.
>> (See [2] for details)
>> Aside from the issue whether the trademark actually is valid for
>> software as well, I wonder whether we should rename the project in
>> Debian for the Stretch release like upstream did.
>>
>> If the claims are substantial, we might get a "don't use that name"
>> letter from the same company as well, since we'd be distributing
>> Terminix under it's old name, making this - kind of - an RC bug.
>> On the other hand, the software was released under the original name,
>> so maybe having it in Stretch under that name is fine?
>>
>> I never faced this issue before, has something like this happened
>> already in the past?
>> Any advice on whether and how this should be resolved would be highly
>> appreciated!
>>
>> If this trademark violation is equivalent to a RC bug, the only way it
>> could be solved would be switching to a new upstream release (patching
>> in a new name isn't really feasible, since the name is used pretty
>> much everywhere, from filenames to settings and strings in the code).
>
> That's odd, but if upstream got renamed, I have no objections in following 
> suit,
> assuming the diff is reasonable (i.e. reasonable changes other than the 
> rename).

That sounds good! Unfortunately though, Terminix hasn't been updated
in Stretch initially because the LDC package it depends on had a RC
bug[1], and now it is again affected by a more subtle bug in LDC[2].
This means that the diff between stretch and the updated package in
Unstable will be huge, unfortunately.
I uploaded the renamed package to unstable now though, since the
previous upstream version in there was already higher (thanks to[1]),
so having it there won't do harm.

I might file an unbock request for Tilix at a later point (after
having it tested in unstable for a while), but given the large diff
getting it actually unblocked is less likely, I think :-/

The whole situation sucks, I never thought that this stuff would cause
that much post-freeze trouble.
In any case, thanks for the feedback! :-)

Cheers,
    Matthias

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850958
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857085

-- 
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/

Reply via email to