On 09/03/17 19:21, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2017-03-09 18:00, Ian Jackson wrote: >> To be fair to Pirate, Andreas Beckmann suggested #856606 that if >> Pirate disagreed with Andreas, Pirate should go to the TC. > > The disagreement between Pirate and me is not about the RC-ness of > #856606, but more about the general requirement of working upgrade paths. > > This is my understanding of Pirate's point: > > "Package P hasn't been part of any stable release so far, therefore > upgrades from earlier package versions don't have to be supported. > So not having a working upgrade path from version 1.2-3 in testing > to version 1.2-5 unstable is not a bug." > > I didn't find anything in the policy about upgrade requirements ... > but I think there is a general agreement that direct upgrades must work > (and only skipping over stable releases is not supported).
Yes. Cheers, Emilio
