On 16.02.2017 22:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 16/02/17 06:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Hi >> >> Please unblock package spice [...] > That failed to build on mips(64)el: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=spice
Hi,
I think this is unrelated to our security fix. The package already
failed on mips64el last month (2017/01/06) with the same build failure.
[1] According to Debian bug #734218 support for mips{64]el was only
enabled recently and it appears that upstream isn't even supporting this
architecture. But on 17. January it build fine again probably after some
manual intervention by the buildd admins. I think we should get in
contact with the mips64el porters or remove spice from these
architectures again.
Regards,
Markus
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=spice&arch=mips64el&ver=0.12.8-2&stamp=1483718594&raw=0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
