Lev Lamberov: > Hi Niels, > > 15.02.2017 22:48, Niels Thykier пишет: >> To avoid any misunderstandings, #855004 need to be fixed before >> swi-prolog/7.2.3+dfsg-6 can migrate. You probably already noticed, but >> the FTP masters have requested a follow up from you. > > Does it mean that swi-prolog should be removed from testing in the first > place and the bug should be closed, or the bug can be closed without > removing? >
It means that swi-prolog/7.2.3+dfsg-6 cannot migrate until the removal of the mips binaries built by swi-prolog/7.2.3+dfsg-5 (note the version difference). This is what #855004 is about. The FTP masters have requested that you deal with the reverse dependencies of the swi-prolog/7.2.3+dfsg-5 on mips. This can be "remove them from mips as well" or ask them to disable their "swi-prolog" support on mips (either way should work). > If removing is necessary, then what is the procedure to allow removed > rdepends to migrate to testing back? Should I request unblock for them > in this case? > > Thanks! > Lev > Preferably, this is dealt with before swi-prolog is auto-removed from testing. If so, swi-prolog/7.2.3+dfsg-6 will migrate to testing and the RC bug will be closed (in testing). Hope that clarified it for you. Otherwise, let us know what you don't understand. Thanks, ~Niels
