On 06/02/17 02:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 15:32:13 +1030, Ron wrote: > >> I've CC'd -release, to see what they'd prefer we do for Jessie. >> It might be that the best option here is to just put something later >> in -bpo, and if people are paranoid, they can choose to use that? >> > I'd prefer to review patches rather than walls of text that refer to > changes in the abstract, since that makes it easier to know what you're > talking about. But based on what I've read it doesn't sound like jessie > needs an update?
This is the commit (along with the analysis): https://git.xiph.org/?p=opus.git;a=commitdiff;h=70a3d641b That being said, the change itself will not help you much unless you pull out the full source, since the illegal read occurs in a different file. Cheers, Jean-Marc
