Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 11:45 +0200, Sebastien Bacher a écrit : > Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 11:07 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > > 1) you did comment on gtk 2.9+ for etch as the main gtk package, but does > > this advice also hold in a 2.0.x vs 2.9+ d-i gtk-dfb scenario ? > > As written previously upstream changed the ABI number so updating to GTK > 2.9 would require updating libgnomeui (and probably some other parts of > GNOME with it) to 2.15, I don't think that's something we want to do for > now no
If we are going to ship GNOME 2.16 in etch, we will have to rebuild all modules, theme engines and the like for this new GTK+, and we'd better do it as soon as possible in experimental. Of course there is no way this new GTK+ can enter unstable before it is declared stable upstream. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
