I'd like to follow-up on this. I will try for an executive summary in case my original message was too long:
* pbseqlib builds three arch:any libraries as well as the arch:all libpbseq-dev that depends on all of their -dev packages * pbseqlib has a new build dependency that does not build on 32-bit architectures (all old pbseqlib binaries have already been removed) * the un-installability of libpbseq-dev on i386 is preventing testing migration. I believe this needs a force-hint. This is also somewhat urgent because some rdeps with fixed RC bugs cannot migrate without this one going first. Thanks and regards Afif على السبت 31 كانون الأول 2016 22:59، كتب Afif Elghraoui: > Hello, > > pbseqlib includes a metapackage (arch:all) to install its component > sub-libraries and development files (arch:any). Since its new dependency > pbbam is not available on 32-bit architectures, this metapackage is not > installable on i386 anymore. Testing migration appears to be blocked > because of this, even though the metapackage would not be new to Stretch: > > ~~~ https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pbseqlib > 11 days old (needed 10 days) > libpbseq/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbdata (>= 0~20161219-1) > libpbseq/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbihdf (>= 0~20161219-1) > libpbseq/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libblasr (>= 0~20161219-1) > libpbseq-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbdata-dev (>= 0~20161219-1) > libpbseq-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbihdf-dev (>= 0~20161219-1) > libpbseq-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libblasr-dev (>= 0~20161219-1) > Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/p/pbseqlib.html > Valid candidate > ~~~ > > Does this situation need a force hint? We need this to migrate in order > to prevent autoremoval of several other packages. > > Thanks and regards > Afif > -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name
