2017-01-04 11:56 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk>: > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2017-01-04 10:12:44) >> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org>: >>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release. >>>> That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it >>>> to unstable, but i tried to do things right and prepared the addons >>>> that need to be rebuilt and binNMUed, then opened a transition bug >>>> #849505. >>>> No answer yet, people are busy, and the number of concerned packages >>>> is low (a dozen or so), should i just rebuild and upload them myself ? >>> The transition freeze was on Nov 5. >> >> This is not very smart - i'm talking about something that will make >> future maintenance and security patches easier, something that is easy >> to do and that i can even do alone. >> Contrast this with an openssl 1.1 upload few days before the >> transition freeze. I don't get it. > > libssl transition was coordinated with the release team well before the > freeze. > Apart from giving up and let things rest as they are (or fall apart and > get kicked out), I believe there is also the option of asking the > release team for permission to do the transition even if late.
Oh, i thought transition bugs were read by release team. Please, release team ? Jérémy
