Hi,
directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any
problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the
time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail
just 2 days before uploading.
For the RMs, when would it be fine with you to move directfb from
experimental to sid? The following lists what's required for this
small "transition".
Packages build-depending on an unversioned directfb (only binNMU
required, which I have successfully built with the new directfb):
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Package: libcairo-directfb
Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: gcompris
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: links2
Maintainer: Mesa package maintainers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: mesa
Packages build-depending on a versioned directfb (sourceful upload
required):
Maintainer: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: dfb++, fusionsound
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: directvnc
Maintainer: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: freesci
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Package: gtk+2.0-directfb
Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: libsdl1.2
Packages build-depending on directfb, but not really using it:
Maintainer: Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: libggi
Maintainer: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: paintlib
I'll be filing bug reports about these last two ones.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
