On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:08:14PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > while this *particular* spurious dependency will go away with a > > simple rebuild of the application (already queued on the > > autobuilders for each of these packages BTW), the underlying problem > > is that these packages don't have very good library handling . . . > Thanks for queueing nip2 for binary NMU. As far as I can tell, vips > also requires this since it also appears to be uninstallable for the > same reason though it was not one of the packages to receive this > bug. (libvips10c2a depends upon libdps1) > If you could first requeue vips and then, once it succeeds and it is > necessary, requeue nip2, that would be most helpful. Yep, you seem to be right; requeued vips as well. > I'll also aim to do a more proper fix as suggested, reuploading as > needed, but I won't have a chance to get to it until at least the > weekend and maybe the weekend after that Sounds good. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
