On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > I don't know how much we care about that... > > > cvm > > mailfront > > > are in testing but Build-Depend on freecdb which isn't. > > Well, that's a release-critical bug, just of a class we don't spend much > time chasing until close to release.
Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract my attention earlier, the release critical bug is resolved as invalid now. > > The maintainer does not intend to migrate to tinycdb and is > > instead adopting freecdb. But it's unclear how long it will > > take for that to be worked out. > > Feel free to raise the severity of the bugs on these packages to "serious", > so they can be removed from testing until tinycdb does get sorted out (if > ever)? Instead please remove the removal hint freecdb/0.62 by djpig; there's nothing wrong with freecdb, I'll upload an updated version soon though. Thanks, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
