On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:23:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > The main thing that we're blocked on at the moment is lam. lam currently > FTBFS on m68k due to a gcc 4.0 bug. I'm going to provide a patch today to > lower the optimization to -O2 for all architectures, based on debian-devel > comments that -O3 isn't a good idea on i386 either, and then it probably > needs an NMU.
Is it the main thing, or the only thing? We have been ignoring m68k-only build failures in select cases for testing migration. > Once the new lam has been uploaded and builds on m68k, the other packages > that depend on it can get uploaded to build with the new lam (including > netpipe, which depends on both lam and mpich and hasn't been built for the > new lam yet). Can these packages be uploaded with a versioned build-dependency on lam? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
