On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.
> The arlib subdir isn't distributable. > Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anything else by Frank Kardel. > I'm not actually sure it will build without these bits. > So I guess NTP should be removed from Debian. It's not very > maintained anyhow, having multiple RC bugs open for quite a while. What are you going to replace it with? AFAIK, ntp is the only package we have in Debian which supports useful clock synchronization, which is essential for a number of other services (e.g., Kerberos). Obviously we can't ship non-distributable code, but I'm not going to remove ntp from testing just because it appears at first blush to be inconsistently licensed. The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
