Hi,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But somehow, the package was no longer listed after a while.
> Really? I've never seen that page track anything but unstable.
This is what I recall, I'll take a screenshot and an alcohol-test next
time.
> > 2/ only 7 of the missing 10 architectures have a buildd log
> I guess you mean s/missing/remaining/, here. I don't see that there are
> 10 architectures missing, I see that the package is built and installed
> in the archive for 7 of 11 archs.
(I meant the 10 missing architectures with respect to what I uploaded,
i386.)
[...]
> In any case, you're probably better off
> waiting a couple of days for the GNOME 2.10 version of the package to
> enter testing.
Ok, I knew this option existed, but I feared the GNOME 2.10 transition
to continue for a while.
> > And I wonder: what happens to TPU and to stable uploads when packages
> > are removed from unstable? You can't update the stable package
> > anymore?
> Well, that's a different bug if so.
(This was out of curiosity indeed.)
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come, your destiny awaits!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
