Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Further transitions > =================== > Please don't do. > > Any further transition has the potential to make it even harder to bring > packages to testing, as this makes the barrier for packages to go to > testing even higher.
Would it be acceptable to upload tetex-bin_3.0 with the binary packages libkpathsea4(-dev), if at the same time we make sure that libkpathsea3 is still available? We could drop the "Provides: libkpathsea-dev" from libkpathsea4-dev, so that no packages accidently gets compiled against the new library. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
