Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:13:01PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > Is it still usefull to ignore this bug? gnome-vfs2 needs to wait > > for gnome-panel (as it conflicts with the current gnome-panel in > > testing), which is waiting for evolution-data-server, which is > > stuck behind libc.. > Yes, because rebuilding against fam right now would mean that GNOME > 2.10 would have to go into testing together with KDE, which also has > packages that depend on libfam0. It will be far easier to coordinate > getting all of these updates into testing if we don't have to have all > of GNOME and KDE both ready to go in at once.
People have pointed out to me that libfam does not actually export C++ symbols. I can upload a new version of fam that Provides instead of Conflicts libfam0c102, which should save a lot of rebuilding for both KDE and GNOME. Is this still a useful thing to do? Or maybe the release team wants to use fam to hold GNOME back in unstable? I can make the upload this weekend if people think it is a good idea. -- Chuan-kai Lin http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~cklin/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
