* Andre Lehovich: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Why can't we treat security support like a broken package, and remove >> it if it isn't fixed by its maintainers? > > The security team are doing a great job supporting Woody.
But only if the basic infrastructure to do their job is in place. If there isn't a full set of buildds, they are screwed. (AFAIK, we don't have a full set of security buildds for neither sarge nor woody right now. Not the fault of the security team, of course.)
