[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote: > > > rlpr is in the same state as pavuk above. > > > I didn't look into pavuk, but rlpr has as far as I see no weird state. > > You seem to be right, though previous attempts to cleanly remove this > package from testing had failed. > > > The latest Debian version is from the above DSA (2.02-7woody1), which > > could savely be included in sarge. Upstream has 2.05, though. > > I would not like to see it removed. > > Are you willing to maintain the package yourself?
I'd be willing, but I'm not a DD (yet). I am an advanced user and did some private packaging before, but didn't find anything useful and unmaintained to help with. So if anyone would sponsor me maintaining rlpr, I could and would help out. On the other hand rlpr isn't officially ophaned, maybe a DD would pick this rather small package up, if that was the case. Would be a quicker move. Bye, Tobias
