On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:16:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:54:38AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > It's come to my attention that on mips(el), the glibc in sarge is > > > incompatible with the kernel in woody, and the kernel in sarge is > > > incompatible with the glibc in woody. This is an impasse that has to be > > > resolved for sarge's release, so that upgrades from woody to sarge can > > > be supported. > > > > What exactly is the issue with kernels in sarge running on woody? > > As I understand it, it's emulation of missing instructions on certain > hardware (at least, that's the case on i386). I was only refering to the special mips case. Sorry if this was confusing.
> > I'm running 2.4.22 without any problems since several months on mips > > now. We could then simply add to the release notes that on woody > > upgrades the kernel has to be updated first, then glibc. > > Modern kernel packages have dependencies that require a glibc newer than > that in woody. To break this deadlock, we need upgrade kernel packages But they shouldn't. I for myself introduced and then later removed this dependency from 2.4.22 to allow for exactly this upgrade path. Thiemo took over the package later and I can't find a note in the changelog that reintroduced this conflict. > so that there's something to which we can point users in the release > notes. There shouldn't be a deadlock in the mips case (unless something really broke running kernels > 2.4.22 on mips/woody at a later point). -- Guido
