Hello dia2code has now been uploaded (again). Hope this really fix the problem.
Regards, // Ola On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 04:02:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > For a while I've been tracking the sarge inclusion of QA-managed > packages. Here is a status report. Some of you are getting this > because you have done something relevant to one or more of these > packages and should stay on top of things. But I have set the > Reply-To to debian-release. If you reply about one or more specific > packages, you might want to add the other relevant people too at your > option. > > First, the special cases. > > According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=lirc, lirc > isn't in testing because there aren't current builds on any > architecture but i386. But according to packages.debian.org/lirc, > this is incorrect, and the latest package (-11) exists for every arch. > According to bugs.debian.org/260565 and bugs.debian.org/267323, the > problem is old outdated binary packages in the archive which need to > be deleted by ftpmaster. In my opinion, this kind of ftpmaster work > needs to take a priority. There are people (see those bugs) > interested in taking over lirc, but still, the package should get into > testing. The actual problem here is that lirc builds multiple > packages; one of them, lirc-svga, is Arch: i386 only. But the new > lirc can't get installed until the bogus non-i386 binaries for > lirc-svga get dropped from the archive. So this is in ftpmaster-wait. > > Second, the lush package is waiting on builds for arm and m68k, but > also upstream does not support ia64, and there are buildd failures > (and also bogus old binary packages). The ia64 build needs to be > dropped from sarge so that when the arm and m68k builds complete, the > package will migrate into sarge. See bugs.debian.org/267474. This is > in ftpmaster-wait. > > The noteedit package is waiting on four autobuilds, but also on > kdelibs, which has release critical bugs. This is presumable the KDE > 3.3 problem. However, the new version should get in (at least one of > the 2.7.1 packages, that is). It doesn't matter which--because the > following uploads are just maintainer changes. But the actual 2.7.1 > is important. So I'm happy to do some work to try and get a version > in compiled against KDE 3.2, but I don't know how to go about it. > > And finally, dia2code and snacc have easy-to-fix FTBFS bugs. Ola > Lundqvist was working on dia2code last week; if he tells me he's going > to fix the latest problem then great--otherwise I'll upload a fix > tomorrow. Likewise snacc has had recent attention, and if Sam Hocevar > tells me he's going to fix the latest problem, great--otherwise I'll > work on it tomorrow. > > The following packages are waiting for builds on the specified > buildd's. Some of these are also too young to get in, but by the time > the arm queue catches up, they probably won't be. > bbconf: in depwait on arm and m68k, waiting on qt-x11-free > gtktalog: arm, hppa > raidtools: arm, hppa > regexx: mips > simplecdrx: arm > trustees: arm > wmapm: arm > xwave: arm > > > The following packages are ready to go and just have to wait the right > number of days before they get into sarge, on the specified day: > kernellab (September 3) > macrosystem (September 3) > masqdialer (September 6) > opendb (September 3) > preferences (September 4) > > > The following have release-critical bugs which are unlikely to be > fixed and it's ok to exclude the packages from sarge in my opinion: > roleplaying > t-gnus -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
