On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:47:29AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Sven Luther writes: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 07:53:09AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > > > > Based on discussions on the debian-kernel list[1], I'd like to > > > > > propose > > > > > that we use 2.4.27 as the 2.4 kernel for all architectures with 2.4 > > > > > kernels > > > > > in sarge. The strongest arguments for 2.4.27, as opposed to 2.4.26 > > > > > were noted > > > > > by tbm [3]. > > > > > > > > One thing to bear in mind when making this kind of decision it that it > > > > seems to take d-i about 2 weeks to transition to a new kernel once the > > > > > > What are the plans regarding 2.6 ? > > > > It will be 2.6.8. > > If you write 2.6.8, do you mean 2.6.8.1? Or is the diff to .1 included > in the Debian packages? I cannot find a hint and the version number is > misleading.
The package is named 2.6.8, but it includes the 2.6.8.1 diffset, i don't know the details, plus some other backports. Exact detail can be found at : http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel/trunk/kernel/source/kernel-source-2.6.8-2.6.8/debian/patches Friendly, Sven Luther
