Hi, Kenshi Muto wrote: > OK, I and Sebastien took worst method. X-( > I didn't want to change libcupsys2 name, but we did...
The libcupsys2 renaming could have been avoided... oh well, you always know better *afterwards*. > Must I revert the package name to libcupsys2? Or provide new package, > libcupsys2-gnutls11? No. As soon as gnutls11 hits Unstable (at the moment, it's still in the New queue), you should build-depend against gnutls11-dev instead of gnutls10-dev, and recompile. You do not need to do anything else, except test that everything still works. (It really should. I just this with exim4 -- it ends up dynamically linked against two versions of gnutls* and gcrypt* each, and it worked.) > I really hate and discourage last transition. I want true best solution > if we start to transit at now. Don't worry! As far as I can see, we can do this without disrupting anything (except the users of old d-i businesscard CD-ROMs). -- Matthias Urlichs
