On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:39:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > We have not changed gnome2.4 packages for > > > weeks/months, if you fear for sarge we just need to put a RC bug on > > > atk/glib/gtk/pango from Gnome2.6 in unstable. > > > > There's no "just" about that. Doing that really does screw things up > > pretty majorly: packages in unstable with RC bugs need to be fixed > > _quickly_. Not immediately, maybe, but not after months and months either. > > So, the right thing is to fix the testing-proposed-update mechanism to > make that happen, is it not ? What is actually the problem in having the > testing script applied to testing-proposed-updates also, and have it > being autobuilt ?
That's actually exactly the current state. However, it's more difficult to get user testing of t-p-u uploads before they get into testing, so it's not really something we want to rely on too much. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
