Nathanael Nerode wrote: > It fits even better. :-) Thanks for finding the time to do this in amongst > all your other work. Rrowr... now there's just db3, db4.0, glibc, > linux-kernel-headers,.... ;-) > > Incidentally, regarding bug #223210, I notice: > * Added a private module.h with extracted data from Linux 2.2 to replace > <linux/module.h> which creates a number parse errors. (closes: > Bug#223210) > > Really, 2.*2*? Any reason for that rather than 2.4?
They're similar. So it's from 2.4 as well. Please take a look at the source and let me know if there are any problems to be expected with it, if you're in doubt. Regards, Joey -- It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.