On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:25:09PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote: > # nice (0.9.5-1 to 0.9.6-1) > * Maintainer: Daniel Bonniot > * Too young, only 4 of 10 days old > * Not considered > * Depends: nice orp-classpath (not considered)
nice | 0.9.6-1 | unstable | source, all
nice Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, kaffe | java1-runtime |
java2-runtime
The java-virtual-machine virtual package is available in testing on all
architectures. The java[12]-runtime virtual package is available on all
but mips* in testing, and is only available due to orp-classpath on mips*
in unstable.
The cheat that says arch:all packages only need their dependencies satisfied
on i386 was missing in the excuses analysis. It's been added now. :(
> I'm not sure if this will still be a problem when nice is old enough to
> be considered, but the current output is at least misleading.
No, it's not. If you're feeling misled, it's almost always because you're
forgetting to look at the other ten architectures we support.
> Daniel
> (please CC me on replies)
Please set your Mail-Followup-To: header.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
