[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes: > This is not a matter of upgrading the boot disk images used in woody. > It's a matter of syncing up the source used to build the already-working > images. It would be much better if this could happen without the > necessity for 3.0.24 or whatever, since there really should be no need > to get all architectures to rebuild boot-floppies just to tweak woody's > Packages and Sources files.
Sounds right to me. Separate, but related, question. Is it ok for us to do a bin-NMU'ish build of boot-floppies for ia64 so that we can move to a new kernel image on a woody point release? We would *really* like to get rid of the 2.4.17 bits in woody and replace them with a fresher 2.4 version that works on more ia64 systems and has been better tested... When we released woody, precious few ia64 systems were "in the wild" and we've learned a lot since then... Bdale
