On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:21:29AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:59:41PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > This does indeed seem to be the case. I've marked iraf (and necessarily > > iraf-noaobin too) to be removed from testing; it'll have a chance to > > return if its release-critical bugs are fixed soon. > > Go ahead and yank it.
OK, thanks. > It needs to be repackaged from scratch at this point, and the person > who I was working with on it hasn't sent me anything about it for > quite some time. I don't have time right now to do a complete > rebuild. I'll resubmit it in the summer if I work it out. Is it worth keeping iraf-ibin? It only suggests iraf, but I thought I'd ask. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
