On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote: > Jordi Mallach wrote: > > [0] today's update excuses claim that meta-gnome2 needs galeon to go in, > > while it really doesn't, as it's just an alternative to > > epiphany-browser. We'll see if this blocks meta-gnome2 tonight, and if > > it does, I'll tell aj to apply some voodoo magic. > > Either you are wrong, the debian testing scripts are buggy or my > script is, because it lists several other reasons why meta-gnome2 > can't go into testing yet: > > ---- > Why is package X not in testing yet? > > Checking meta-gnome2 > > - meta-gnome2 has no old version in testing (trying to add, not update) > - meta-gnome2 is only 1 days old. It must be 2 days to go in. > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies: > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips > - gnome-office needs planner compiled for m68k, mips, sparc
Those don't make it not a valid candidate. > - galeon is out of date on arm: 1.3.3.20030419-1 vs 1.3.11a-2 (probably > build problems) > - galeon is out of date on sparc: 1.3.10-3 vs 1.3.11a-2 (probably build > problems) These are as Jordi commented above. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
