On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:28:49PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > Any opinions from -release?
AFAICS 193062 shouldn't be serious, or even necessarily open. I don't believe the presence of debug symbols violates anything in the sarge RC policy, nor that it should do so. OTOH, the maintainer is the one who titled the bug "subversion should not enter testing", and marked it serious, which is well within his rights. We might need to announce a policy of automatically closing serious bugs of the form "<foo> should not enter testing" to ensure people document the *reason* it shouldn't enter testing, rather than the fact that it shouldn't enter testing, if it's proving harmful. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
