Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:14:10PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > > Hi, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > The fixed package version will be 1:1.3.2-1.sarge.2 > > > > > > That's a version number which looks like a binary NMU, which AFAIK causes > > > problems. > > > > We would use 1:1.3.2-1sarge2 for a security update, but either should > > be fine. > > > > Matthias, where would the above version cause problems? > > It appears to confuse britney a bit at the moment.
Hmm. Which dot is the problem? The last one or the last but one? Regards, Joey -- Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect.